Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various options available for teens in light of the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, since many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to achieve this.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from this is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it’s important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is one of regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths over the past few years.
The writer does not may actually recognize vapinger.com the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
Although it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the quantity of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes because they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.